4.7 KiB
4.7 KiB
Experiment Index
| Experiment | Question | Result | Confidence change | Next question |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000 — Resonance Bench | Does a consistent programmable-feeling magical system provoke self-directed experimentation? | Failed to provoke curiosity; solved in ≤3 minutes, tolerant predicates made timing/direction irrelevant | H02 down; H03/H07/H10/H11 more salient | Does embodied output make the same laws perceptible and worth manipulating? |
| 001 — Flux Familiar | Does mapping the same signals to visible motion create a consequential, open behavior space? | Failed almost immediately; felt like brute-force steering, and smarter automation was explicitly predicted to be tedious | H02/H11 down; H12/H13 added | Does direct systemic action under meaningful stakes create curiosity and incentive? |
| 002 — Conversion Breach | Is directly exploiting transfer, storage, temperature, and momentum interesting, and does pressure help? | Two long Breach runs but little renewed discovery; revision 2 reached wave 29 and numerically collapsed into the same wall-blast answer | H16 supported as persistence, not durable fun; H08 weakly supported for continuation; H15 reduced | Do changing qualitative requirements make direct physical construction worth revising? |
| 003 — Rig Trials | Is modifying a directly piloted construction across different physical requirements enjoyable? | Boring despite all trials completed in ~6:47; obvious counter-loadouts and inconsequential placement, not awkward controls | H06/H17 down as implemented; voluntary experimentation shown insufficient | Does inferring and transferring a surprising stable law create real interest? |
| 004 — Invariant Rooms | Does learning an unfamiliar environmental law and transferring it across rooms generate curiosity? | A self-directed marker experiment occurred, but was unsatisfying; transfer was brute-forced because the predictive model never formed | H03 reinforced as a requirement; H18 down as a sufficient source of fun | Can systemic knowledge create valued agency during recoverable chaos rather than an abstract terminal answer? |
| 005 — Sanctuary Wake | Does a coupled physical tool become enjoyable in a changing, recoverable rescue crisis without stat growth? | Wanted to stop immediately; readable chaos became unmanageable, charge reduced agency, and rescue outcomes inspired no care | H08/H19 down as sufficient; indiscriminate coupling identified as harmful | Is assertive, selective action intrinsically more valuable than custodial management? |
| 006 — Breakline | Are targeted combat/movement verbs enjoyable without progression, timers, or accumulating failure? | No; all sets were cleared, but strike dominated, tether hurt positioning, dash was forgotten, and reflection was interesting to inspect but attention-splitting rather than fun | H20 down as a sufficient cause; voluntary replay again separated from enjoyment | Does rapid, deliberately chosen qualitative transformation make otherwise serviceable action worth continuing? |
| 007 — Catalyst Trials | Does rapid qualitative chosen growth create value beyond matched numerical amplification? | Successful: mutation prompted at least four repeat/comparison runs, wrong predictions, revised build knowledge, conditional small/big-enemy mapping, and a qualified fun report; numerical choices were boring | H21/H22 strongly up; H23 added; first clear curiosity chain | Can changing enemy ecologies and limited composition preserve reasoning without prescribing counter-loadouts? |
| 008 — Catalyst Ecology | Can a four-choice compositional system remain interesting across small, durable, and spawning populations? | Building was enjoyable but meaningless: mature effects became clear, yet almost any build/baseline seemed sufficient and the cap carried no felt tradeoff | H23 down as implemented; H24 added with strong support | Can capability-sensitive escalation give qualitative building weight without prescribing one answer? |
| 009 — Catalyst Ascent | Does capability-sensitive escalation make an enjoyable build meaningful through several causal routes? | Ready for playtest | Tests H24 while separating consequence from raw health inflation | Does a limitation create anticipation, tactical expression, and another build question—or only compulsory throughput? |